One idea is that the videos may be carrying a payload or affecting
memory elsewhere when played, through memory leaks. This would be a
significant exploit and would be a huge deal. More specifically,
u/FesterCluck believed the entity behind UFSC is
pen-testing for a GPU RAM exploit via YouTube (or video content in
This is a bit of a controversial theory. Many of us are not sure how this would work, or if it is even possible, but as of now hasn’t been proven either way.
festercluck has in multiple occasions identified similarities between malformed MPEG atoms of UFSC videos and Android’s Stagefright family of media-related exploits - including the timeline and specific vectors of attack such as CVE-2019-2017. Whether the use of these exploits is intentional or simply bugs or poor standard compliance from a custom encoder is hard to determine externally. Another criticism of this theory is that there seems to be little to gain from a successful Stagefright exploit on a YouTube viewer’s device other than knowing it’s possible or not (which could still be very valuable as a 0day or white-hat discovery or grey-hat personal research).
A strong argument in favor of Stagefright in particular (and also Rowhammer, to a lesser extent) was the seeming gravity, exploitabilty and high-profile nature of the bugs (including major media coverage). This coincides with UFSC’s timeline, at a time where the bugs were still very much “out there” and “up for grabs” for anyone who was able to turn the theoretical exploits into actual attacks - while fixes would come very slowly due to the sheer amount of attack vectors (and be impossible without replacing hardware, in the case of Rowhammer).
Ultimately, neither family of exploits were ever weaponized to their full potential, due to the difficulty of leveraging the bugs into practical uses for bad actors. The end of UFSC with the Strange Reset could be seen either as a surrender after the window of opportunity drew to a close - or that a potential, desirable attack was finally found and as such, the author(s) completed the project and attempted to erase any traces left of it.
festercluck’s theories on Stagefright and Rowhammer exploits.
festercluck, generated on an old Android smartphone.
The videos have been shown to cause strange behavior in some cases, such as playing after the YouTube duration bar is over or causing Android phones to shut down their screens. Whether this is intended or a byproduct of the custom process used in creating videos is unknown.
While many reports of glitches have been made, few instances have been recorded and even less properly archived for posterity. In fact, it seems natural for reports to become more rare as interest in the old videos wane and video software irons out any glitches, over time. One of the few wiki pages with multiple recordings of such glirches is ♐OR.
Another possibility is that the author(s) are trying to reverse-engineer YouTube internals (or Twitter, for that particular account) by creating scenarios that would target specific systems such as transcoding, storage or copyright identification.
To this effect, Discord user
festercluck has pointed out a plethora of publicly-known unitialized-memory bugs within
ffmpeg which YouTube (and possibly other platforms, including Twitter and Twitch) use for transcoding videos, some of which lie behind labeled-unsafe performance flags that YouTube seemingly chooses to utilize. Any memory segments exposed in such a way would probably be miniscule and too random to garner meaningful information for any practical purpose (but then again UFSC did upload thousands of videos, many with very long durations, which could have been an attempt at maximizing this attack surface)… Another open question is what sort of useful in-mermoy data could be extracted from a YouTube rendering-farm server, if any.
One user-facing example of such is the “rainbow column” found on older videos’ thumbnails (as seen when navigating on the video’s timeline), which is the result of a small section of uninitialized memory being used as RGB image data. This particular bug has been fixed for many years now but can still be found on older videos uploaded while the glitch was still in operation.
The very name “Unfavorable Semicircle” has been suggested to be a play on the famous
© copyright symbol - with YouTube’s ContentID being “unfavorable” for bad actors who’d like to use the platform for piracy and profit. UFSC’s strategy for reverse-engineering this system would be for thousands of similar videos of different lengths to be uploaded then claimed as copyright, then monitor whether they found matches between themselves, potentially exposing manners in which content is identified by YouTube or weaknesses to be exploited.
In November 2021, Discord user
electrojustin reported the
possiblity of UFSC being an attack on YouTube meant to reveal
proprietary video codec- and compression-related information